Author Topic: Anyone prefer Mircarta?  (Read 1689 times)

SkyHigh

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
Anyone prefer Mircarta?
« on: May 29, 2016, 12:22:58 AM »
I have owned my share of high end guitar and various materials for saddle.

It seems sometimes bone is too clean sounding...too much note separation...or lacks warmth. For some reason Tusq/Marcarta saddle works better at times.

Any of you prefer Mircarta to bone?

Cheers!

Strumming Fool

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12412
  • Christi simus non nostri
Re: Anyone prefer Mircarta?
« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2016, 07:42:18 AM »
My 2013 FLTD has a Micarta saddle that was intended to support the ES2 system, which had just been introduced. All my other Taylors have bone saddles. I have no intention of switching to bone on this guitar as it sounds every bit as good as the rest of the herd.
My Taylor Grand Auditoriums:

1997 Cujo14 - old growth cedar/black walnut
2014 K24e - master grade koa
2018 Custom GA - bear claw sitka spruce/mahogany
2019 614 - torrified sitka spruce/flamed maple
2020 714 - lutz spruce/rosewood

Peachlander77

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 29
Re: Anyone prefer Mircarta?
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2016, 02:34:58 AM »
I'm not a huge fan of Mircarta but understand why it's being used as it's a good alternative to bone.  That being said, if you can get the real thing, why settle for less?  My luthier always carves a new saddle out of bone.  Obviously, he's a traditional builder with extra reserves of real bone and antlers, he's acquired over the years.  It's kind of crazy.  So, I like the sustainability of mircarta.  I'm not opposed to using Mircarta providing the guitar is setup properly.

Earl

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1954
  • Quando omni flunkus moritati
Re: Anyone prefer Mircarta?
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2016, 10:10:03 AM »
I generally don't switch out nuts and saddles from the OEM version.  I figure they chose that material for a reason.  If it ain't broke, dont fix it.  Years later when new ones are needed due to wear or updating a setup, I might try bone or something else at that time.
Taylors:  424-LTD (all koa) and a 114ce that lives with friends in Alaska.  Low maintenance carbon fiber guitars are my "thing" these days, but I will always keep the koa 424.  Several ukulele and bass guitars too. 
*Gone but not forgotten:  a 2001 414ce, 410, 354-LTD twelve string, 314-N, 416-LTD baritone, T5 Classic, 615ce, 2006 GS-K, 1996 (first year) Baby

Gutch

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 545
    • www.davegutshall.com
Re: Anyone prefer Mircarta?
« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2016, 10:54:17 AM »
I just switched out the standard (compensated 'B') Tusq saddle in my 416ce to Taylor's Micarta "Wave" saddle.  While the change was originally intended to improve intonation, I found the Micarta brought some warmth to the tone.  It does a nice job of rounding off the high frequency harshness that tends to be prevalent with the Ovangkol/Sitka combo of the 400 series, making the voice more balanced. 


ETA:  I've tried bone in my '02 Coco/Sitka 814c and that guitar just sounds better with the original Tusq.  OTOH, my experience tells me that bone works very well with larger bodied Rosewood and Koa guitars. 
« Last Edit: May 30, 2016, 10:57:39 AM by Gutch »
‎"Music is a moral law. It gives soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination, and charm and gaiety to life and to everything."
-- Plato

jima9426

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Anyone prefer Mircarta?
« Reply #5 on: May 30, 2016, 03:54:56 PM »
Any of you prefer Mircarta to bone?

Yes, I do, for my AE stage guitar. Much more consistent across all strings.
2016 Yamaha FG-180 50th Anniversary
2014 Martin 000-18
2013 Gibson Fuller's J-35
2013 Taylor GS Mini Mahogany
2012 Martin OM-21
2011 Martin S1 Uke
1987 Martin D-18
1983 Guild D-25-CH
1972 Martin D-45 (inherited in '13)
1972 Yamaha FG-180 (retired in '13)
1961 Martin 000-18 (semi-retired in '14)