Please don't take this post the wrong way. I mean it all respectfully, even though parts of it might come out a bit sarcastic. I also have no trouble respecting that this rule is a part of this forum. It's all good

I just have a real struggle finding the logic in the arguments.
So, everybody thinks that price is at least a small factor in buying a guitar. But for some reason, most of us here seem to think that adult people should be protected against this information. Because A) They are of a type that can't be trusted to use this information wisely; as a part of many factors in choosing a guitar and a seller. B) They are of an even worse kind: The type that puts price before everything else (we can't have that here, can we?) C) We have to protect adult people from getting "hurt" if they suddenly discovered that they paid "too much" (even though we already agreed that we would have no trouble paying a bit more for the right guitar).
And in the same breath, we say, or at least imply, A, B and C above, AND that "It's no problem, we can just do it via PM".
As I said, I really don't get this ...
And we are also neglecting consequenses like A) People spending a LOT more of their hard earned money than they probably should, because the seller senses that the buyer is not very well informed. B) Making it much more difficult to give credit to sellers that have great prices and at the same time provide excellent service. Yes, of course we can say things like "I would email X - you might be surprised...", but for somebody who thinks MAP is the absolute lowest price you can get, it might not mean much... C) Deciding, on behalf of other, adult people, which information they are worthy of getting easy access to, and judging them on basis of what priorities they have when looking for a guitar.
I know all of you are good, well meaning people, and that none of you advocate such a rule in order to be mean in any way. So I'm not trying to imply that you are. But the above "summary" is how my brain interpretes the arguments, and it really puzzles me.
I know too many people, some that are really close to me, that alway gets ripped of when they buy stuff. Not all of us have the same ability to gather and interprete data in this Internet age. I guess I would just very much like to not make it any harder. If that means that I would have to tolerate some "Black Friday" posts once in a while, then so be it. I also do trust that most people realize that many factors contribute to a good shopping experience. And those who buy only on basis of price ... well, it's their choice...
What about making a pricing-FAQ of some sort? It could describe the normal range of discount to expect from MSRP, but also give some thoughs about why you might not would want to save that extra $200. It could focus on other factors that experienced guitar players find important when buying a guitar. Things like finding the "right" guitar, trying before buying, benefits of buying locally and in all fairness also mention that some online sellers have fairly good return policies. In addition, it could say something about total price, when shipping and sales tax are added.
Well, I've written a lot now, while I probably just should let it rest. I have no hope in changing anybody's opinion on this matter, and it is not a problem either. This will be a nice place anyway

I just really get very puzzled when the majority seems to reason in a way that I really don't understand. So I just felt a need to express myself ... you can call it self-therapy
