Author Topic: Why are the 2011 Fall Limited Cocobolos not that popular?  (Read 4313 times)

retiredat21

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Why are the 2011 Fall Limited Cocobolos not that popular?
« on: April 18, 2012, 04:44:16 AM »
Just based on my observations because a lot of guitar sellers (Guitar Rodeo, Martin Guitars, LA guitar Sales, Wildwood  Guitars) still sell them, and usually, fall ltd taylors are always sold out.

Are the not that good?

jalbert

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 283
  • I should be practicing
Re: Why are the 2011 Fall Limited Cocobolos not that popular?
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2012, 07:28:11 AM »
I'd say it's because they're considerably more expensive than the limiteds in the lower numbered series. And when you get into the higher price ranges, there's a lot more competition. I'd offer it has nothing to do with them not being good guitars!
James

'07 GA8-12
'19 Academy 12e-N

Gutch

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 545
    • www.davegutshall.com
Re: Why are the 2011 Fall Limited Cocobolos not that popular?
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2012, 09:14:00 AM »
I think the other issue is, as someone pointed out previously, is that Cocobolo seems to be the fallback tonewood for the limiteds every year.  That makes the limiteds made of this wood not so limited in the eyes of the buyer.  I would suggest they let Cocobolo take a couple years off to help drive demand back up.  In the meantime, introduce a new and equally interesting wood to the higher end limiteds.  Ziricote?  Perhaps A funky grained something or other that grabs the eye and the ear equally?  Don't know what, but it would again position Taylor as the company willing to step away from tradition and introduce the public to something new.
‎"Music is a moral law. It gives soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination, and charm and gaiety to life and to everything."
-- Plato

Maynard9089

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 77
Re: Why are the 2011 Fall Limited Cocobolos not that popular?
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2012, 09:57:06 AM »
I want the LTDS to stick to the traditional Taylor Series numbering. 6xx's are maple, 4xx's are ovangkol and so on. If they want to introduce woods out of the normal series then create some new number or ID for it. When I was shopping I was comparing new and used but many of the 414ce's I found were LTDs so it wasn't a direct comparison. I was new to Taylors and their numbering system was relatively easy to understand with a minimal amount of research. I prefer it over the Martin and many other manufacturers numbering which I am still confused with. So far this is the only gripe I have with Taylor and as much as it annoys me, in reality it is pretty minor.
2012 Taylor 414ce
2013 Taylor GS-Mini Mahogany

ataylor

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 497
    • I'm recording an album -- check it out on Kickstarter!
Re: Why are the 2011 Fall Limited Cocobolos not that popular?
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2012, 10:34:22 AM »
I want the LTDS to stick to the traditional Taylor Series numbering. 6xx's are maple, 4xx's are ovangkol and so on. If they want to introduce woods out of the normal series then create some new number or ID for it. When I was shopping I was comparing new and used but many of the 414ce's I found were LTDs so it wasn't a direct comparison. I was new to Taylors and their numbering system was relatively easy to understand with a minimal amount of research. I prefer it over the Martin and many other manufacturers numbering which I am still confused with. So far this is the only gripe I have with Taylor and as much as it annoys me, in reality it is pretty minor.

The series numbers are just as much about appointments as they are wood combinations. And assigning new numbers for every batch of limited runs twice a year seems like it would be more confusing than less in the long run. I think staying within a series number for a wood change (such as offering several 400 series guitars in rosewood) makes more sense than giving that guitar a new number or assigning it a 700 or 800 number.

And when Taylor does a special run of limiteds that don't necessarily tie in to a certain series, It makes sense to be more literal with the name by going with the wood type.

As for the original topic, I think that as the BTO program is as popular as ever, folks looking to buy a Taylor in cocobolo might be opting to do it their way or buying similar guitars custom-ordered by dealers. The refresh of much of Taylor's lineup and the reintroduction of the Builder's Series might be factors as well.
2005 Taylor 210 (sitka/sapele)

e8n

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 205
Re: Why are the 2011 Fall Limited Cocobolos not that popular?
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2012, 01:33:23 PM »
I played the GA at Jim's and it is spectacular.  It is also sold from what I am told.  The thing I really didn't like about it was actually the inlay.  I always thought I would like the wood inlay but seeing it in person it doesn't do it for me.  The sound on the other hand is just unbelievable. 

-Dave
2011 Taylor Custom GS (Adi/Rosewood)
2012 Taylor 814LTD Spring Limited
2008 Fender Telecaster
2010 Kentucky Mandolin

Guitars of the past: Alvarez AD60, 2007 Taylor 110ce, 2006 Taylor 710ce, Taylor 2008 GS Fall Ltd, 2010 Taylor 814ce, 2010 Taylor K26c,2010 Taylor Custom DN, Taylor 714ce

Greenheart

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Why are the 2011 Fall Limited Cocobolos not that popular?
« Reply #6 on: April 19, 2012, 09:13:01 PM »
Just based on my observations because a lot of guitar sellers (Guitar Rodeo, Martin Guitars, LA guitar Sales, Wildwood  Guitars) still sell them, and usually, fall ltd taylors are always sold out.

Are the not that good?

I see you asked the same question over on the AGF and I think Ted from LA Guitar Sales answered it best when he wrote "if every guitar sold in 90-days it would mean Taylor didn't make enough"

 I see MFG just got their first 2012 spring LTD's, are you expecting him to sell all of them before fall?
Paul

714ce

S MS Picker

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 412
Re: Why are the 2011 Fall Limited Cocobolos not that popular?
« Reply #7 on: April 19, 2012, 09:46:47 PM »
I think the other issue is, as someone pointed out previously, is that Cocobolo seems to be the fallback tonewood for the limiteds every year.  That makes the limiteds made of this wood not so limited in the eyes of the buyer.  I would suggest they let Cocobolo take a couple years off to help drive demand back up.  In the meantime, introduce a new and equally interesting wood to the higher end limiteds.  Ziricote?  Perhaps A funky grained something or other that grabs the eye and the ear equally?  Don't know what, but it would again position Taylor as the company willing to step away from tradition and introduce the public to something new.
I agree. How about a 400 series in Ancient Kauri Whitebait? ;D
Steve
"99 414
2000 410Ce
"05 214
"06 410CE (short scale)
"10 814CE-LTD(fall)
"11 414CE-LTD(fall)
"11 412CE
"12 Custom GS  Adi/Hog

 -other-
"12 Eastman E20D
"? Silvertone (Sears) 2 lipstick tube PU electric

resonator48

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 82
Re: Why are the 2011 Fall Limited Cocobolos not that popular?
« Reply #8 on: April 21, 2012, 08:33:07 AM »
As beautiful as the Coco's are, and they are gorgeous, they are one of the most inconsistent when it comes to tone. At least that's been my experience. I've played a couple that were spectacular in the tone department. I would have bought if I had the coin at the time. That said, I've played a lot of Coco's that didn't sound as good as the much lessor priced Taylor's.