But on the whole, I tend to disagree with those (including Bob Taylor himself) who say there is no perceivable difference in sound character from laminated-bodied guitars. I
definitely could hear a difference. And for those that might say the conditions of the test were different: I played all four guitars in the same sitting, in the same room (Empire Music's 'back room'), under the same atmospheric conditions. And they were all Sitka-topped GS Minis. So the only apparent difference was the wood laminates of the bodies...
[/quote]
I agree with you completely that the back and sides of a laminate DO have an audible affect on tone, because I've had similar experiences playing several sitka topped Minis with different body woods. Like you, I can definitely hear a difference, and I can also hear a definite difference between a hog top and a sitka top with the same body woods. (No disrespect intended, but I can't believe there are people who think there's no audible difference between how a hog-topped and sitka-topped Mini sound -- that's why people choose one over the other.
)
But there's one other factor, and that's variability between different guitars made of the exact same woods. In any music store that has more than one hog-topped or sitka-topped Mini, you can usually identify differences (sometimes dramatic) between them even though they should sound very similar. I don't know what it is, but with Minis I find more variability from guitar to guitar than with any other Taylor model. When I bought my own sitka Mini I had three to choose from, and the one I bought sounded clearly better in many different ways compared to the other two sitka Minis.
So to the OP, it isn't just deciding on the wood, it's also finding the guitar that speaks to you. Before I bought my sitka Mini I was unimpressed with the Minis I'd played previously, and I honestly wondered what all the fuss was about. But I kept an open mind, and eventually I found an amazing Mini that was totally worth buying.