Author Topic: Engelmann vs sitka top  (Read 6986 times)

Strumming Fool

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12412
  • Christi simus non nostri
Re: Engelmann vs sitka top
« Reply #15 on: March 15, 2014, 04:24:49 PM »
I love Engelmann on mahogany and rosewood. It's also made my 2012 maple BTO anything but a run-of-the-mill maple guitar. It's softer and warmer than Sitka with a slightly more focused tone than cedar. I hear no volume differences between Sitka and Engelmann. Glad to hear that a new supply has been found....
My Taylor Grand Auditoriums:

1997 Cujo14 - old growth cedar/black walnut
2014 K24e - master grade koa
2018 Custom GA - bear claw sitka spruce/mahogany
2019 614 - torrified sitka spruce/flamed maple
2020 714 - lutz spruce/rosewood

madx2

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 251
Re: Engelmann vs sitka top
« Reply #16 on: March 15, 2014, 07:58:13 PM »
Has anyone here played a 2013 710 vs a 2014 710?  The '13 has an Engelmann top and the '14 now has sitka.  I would be interested in some "educated ears" giving opinions if they can hear a difference.  I have GAS bad for this '13 and that ain't good.

fretted

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: Engelmann vs sitka top
« Reply #17 on: March 15, 2014, 10:09:00 PM »
I have Englemann on a luthier made OM sized guitar, but with a deeper Indian Rosewood body. You can barely see the grain lines in the spruce. It sounds delicious and I'm not usually a Rosewood guy at least on a smaller guitar. The trebles are usually tinkly and thin sounding to my ears in my finger style of play. Not so with the Engelmann. They seem softer and rich but just as loud. And I've never run out of head room on the volume. I'm not a hard flat-pick strummer though.
1993(?) 410 Special Edition (Rosewood/cut-away)
1995 412
1997 810
1998 Mahogany Baby
2000 714
2010 DN3
2013 Mini Mahogany
2014 522 12 fret
About two dozen other brands of guitars, mandolins, ukuleles, banjos and Venezuelan Cuatros, not to mention the flutes, pennywhistles and the piano.