... He recommend a set up and said he would make a new tusq saddle that follows the arch of the neck. He also filed the nut slots and adjusted the truss rod...
was the saddle replaced because the radius did not match the fretboard radius & did you notice any audible
difference in amplified tone, as the original saddle is listed as being micarta, rather than tusq, in the specs ?
i'm kind of surprised that the nut slots needed to have work done, as i thought there was a "standard spec"
used that's usually pretty good & from the description you gave of how the guitar played & sounded when you
received it , i would have figured that a neck reset might have been necessary in order to find the "sweet spot" -
glad that it's all good now & thanks for sharing
I have not plugged it in yet so I'm not sure on the question of amplified tone.
It's funny you mentioned the possibility of a neck reset because that's exactly what I was thinking it would need.
I mentioned that to the tech and he said if it came to that he'd let me know but it was not necessary.
I too was surprised by the nut filing. I assumed that on an instrument of this caliber, they would have that down to a science.
Not so! I didn't realize it until he pointed out to me how high the strings were off the fret board at the nut. The ruler don't lie!
To be honest, I was thinking of getting rid of it! Now I'm so happy I didn't!!!
Here are before and after pics of the nut.
On the saddle, he said the bottom side did not follow the radius of the neck and that was another piece of the puzzle.
It always seems to be a combination of little things that add up to a great set up.
Thanks for the interest and the input Mike!