Author Topic: The Appeal of Simple Guitars  (Read 17011 times)

Letsemgo

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: The Appeal of Simple Guitars
« Reply #30 on: November 03, 2013, 04:37:44 PM »
My folks instilled in me as a young boy "Simplicity is elegance" and still holds today..
2013 GS Mini-e Mahogany
2004 Taylor Big Baby
2013 414ce-FLTD
2006 Guild D50

tommieboy

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: The Appeal of Simple Guitars
« Reply #31 on: November 03, 2013, 05:13:59 PM »
Bling and expensive tone woods were everything when I was younger. Now days I am very satisfied with quality built sitka / mahogany, 6 and 12 string guitars. I have no need or wanting for adirondack tops, scalloped braces, etc. I have my Guild 1970's F-30 6 strings and my mid 1990's Taylor 555 12 strings to keep me busy these days. From an aesthetic point of view, my Taylor 555 12 strings are the 12 string guitars that I wished Guild had built. Taylor hit a home run with these older 555's, and I opted for the Taylor 12 strings over the Guilds. But I still only wear t-shirts with Guild on them.... :P

One of my older Guild F-30's will be needing a lot TLC $$$ in the near future. Money that could partially fund a newer blinged-out high end Martin if I felt a need for one, but I don't.

Thank you Taylor for these beautiful 12 string guitars.

Tommy

catan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: The Appeal of Simple Guitars
« Reply #32 on: November 03, 2013, 10:27:41 PM »
Gotta love the poor man's 914ce :D

(a ltd 414ce with bone nut/saddle upgrade)

http://www.ginomusica.it/images/products/Taylor-414ce-Fall-Limited_01.jpg
Gear:
2011 Taylor 414ce Fall LTD (Sitka/EIR)
Fishman Loudbox Mini

Jersey tuning

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5022
  • Quid Me Anxius Sum
Re: The Appeal of Simple Guitars
« Reply #33 on: November 04, 2013, 07:06:08 AM »
I dislike the appearance of gussied up Martins.Sort of like taking your ugly grandmother and putting her in Chanel couture.  Somehow Taylor gets it right: what attracted me to my 614 ce was, first and foremost, its playability and brightness, but undeniably its tastefully done spiffiness was a factor as well.

That being said, I love the simplicity of my 1930 Martin 2-17.  The unadorned aged mahogany says it all.

CURRENTLY PLAYING

'30 Martin 2-17 solid Mahogany
'97 Tacoma PK-30 Sitka/koa
'99 Alhambra 11C classical cedar/EIR
'05 TAYLOR 614ce 
'07 Breedlove Atlas 12-string Sitka/Mahogany
'10 Froggy Bottom "C" Adi/Brazilian   
'11 TAYLOR BTO GC 12-fret sinker/EIR.  
'14 Alvarez Baritone Sitka/Mahogany
'18 Cordoba hybrid Flamenco Euro Spruce/Ziricote
'23 M. Colbert Baritone Alaskan Sitka/Black Limba multiscale with Manzer wedge

PHILLIP

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: The Appeal of Simple Guitars
« Reply #34 on: November 04, 2013, 07:46:19 AM »
I agree!
I prefer to get pretty wood and simple.I usually get satin finish and buff them myself because I hate hi gloss...

Strumming Fool

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12412
  • Christi simus non nostri
Re: The Appeal of Simple Guitars
« Reply #35 on: November 04, 2013, 08:17:09 AM »
I love the all-wood inlays of my 2013 FLTD 514e:

My Taylor Grand Auditoriums:

1997 Cujo14 - old growth cedar/black walnut
2014 K24e - master grade koa
2018 Custom GA - bear claw sitka spruce/mahogany
2019 614 - torrified sitka spruce/flamed maple
2020 714 - lutz spruce/rosewood

werkout52

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: The Appeal of Simple Guitars
« Reply #36 on: November 04, 2013, 09:24:37 AM »
I love the all-wood inlays of my 2013 FLTD 514e:



I liked all the wood trim but the main thing that hooked me on looks was the ebony headstock overlay. Simple but beautiful.
1974 Aria
2011 Eastman E20om
2013 Taylor 514e FLTD
2015 Martin D28 Authentic 1937

joshsimpson79

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: The Appeal of Simple Guitars
« Reply #37 on: November 04, 2013, 12:06:33 PM »
I love the all-wood inlays of my 2013 FLTD 514e:



I liked all the wood trim but the main thing that hooked me on looks was the ebony headstock overlay. Simple but beautiful.

I'm in agreement to let the shape and the woods speak for themselves, but boy do I love that new 514. 
2022 GT Mahogany
2013 GS Mini-E Mahogany
Cordoba C5

Strumming Fool

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12412
  • Christi simus non nostri
Re: The Appeal of Simple Guitars
« Reply #38 on: November 04, 2013, 07:41:55 PM »
I love the all-wood inlays of my 2013 FLTD 514e:



I liked all the wood trim but the main thing that hooked me on looks was the ebony headstock overlay. Simple but beautiful.

Agree...and the headstock's even nicer at a closer range:

My Taylor Grand Auditoriums:

1997 Cujo14 - old growth cedar/black walnut
2014 K24e - master grade koa
2018 Custom GA - bear claw sitka spruce/mahogany
2019 614 - torrified sitka spruce/flamed maple
2020 714 - lutz spruce/rosewood

PureTone

  • Guest
Re: The Appeal of Simple Guitars
« Reply #39 on: November 04, 2013, 07:56:27 PM »
This one is about as simple as it gets, save for the bridge inlay.
http://www.themusiczoo.com/product/19199/Taylor-BTO-12-String-Acoustic-Electric-Guitar/
Still, seems to be a lot of coin for what's basically a gloss finish Adirondack top 456E.

Jurrasicway

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: The Appeal of Simple Guitars
« Reply #40 on: November 06, 2013, 07:40:29 AM »
You're not alone in your preference for simple appointments on guitars. I've never liked flashy inlays or bindings. The most "bling" I like to see on a guitar is a really nice sunburst top. Even Taylor's acoustic/non-cutaway line is stretching it for me just because of the abalone rosette. I'd much rather see a wood rosette or ivoroid.

My favorite guitars are the models of the 1930s and 40s -- such as the Gibson J-35 and the Martin 17 series. I've got a 35 model Fairbanks on the way and I'm thinking about a Martin D-15M later in the year (although their new D-18 looks like a gem -- I'd have a tough time resisting one of those in an amber sunburst).

Taylors seem increasingly too "blingy" for my taste, especially the cutaway models/series. That said, the new 700 is a breath of fresh air, and the GS mini in mahogany is climbing my list of awesome guitars pretty rapidly. If it was all-mahogany (even with laminate b/s) with an ebony headstock overlay I'd probably buy one yesterday.
Plus one for this post +++++++++++++++++++++++++++1
512 12 Fret.

PureTone

  • Guest
Re: The Appeal of Simple Guitars
« Reply #41 on: November 06, 2013, 10:16:27 AM »
The original 500-700 Series had a 3 ring rosette and dot fretmarkers like the 300/400 Series. In the 90's, the switch was made to Abalone and the fretmarkers were more intricate. In 01 the 500 and 700s had a Koa rosette with Rosewood binding, then reverted to an Abalone Rosette in 07 when the Acoustic Series rolled out.
Recently the 700s and 500s lost the Abalone and gone to Ivoroid, in an aesthetic interpretation of guitars that were built 40 years prior to Taylor's existence. All wood appointments are on the Koa Series and although it's not Ablam and ZipFlex, it's wood 'bling'. Some like it and other that preferred the appointment of the 11 models will have to adapt to find NOS/pre-owned stock.
For the most part, the LTDs in 09 began moving away from Abalone rosettes/purfling  and MOP inlays. I suspect that there is no additional materials cost in wood appointments, but the labor is more intensive, as binding has to be pre-bent, just as the sides are and they don't seem to want to just stay in-place as much as non-hardwood binding after they're glued.
Personally, I don't see Taylors as being over-adorned to the point of being 'over-the-top' and the aesthetics throughout the line in 10 are the ones I liked the most. Those days are over, but that's ok. The guitar that sounds and plays 'the best' to me is what I look for and everything else falls into place (with the only true deal-breaker being if I can't afford the $ tag).

mikeguywest

  • Guest
Re: The Appeal of Simple Guitars
« Reply #42 on: November 06, 2013, 11:51:08 AM »
Some bling is OK, and some I don't prefer. I like gloss finishes - EIR just doesn't look its best (IMO) in a satin finish. I also like the gloss peghead as on my 2012 GS8e, verses the satin one on the 2013 816e. I prefer the wood bindings over the black or white (though I don't mind my simple Ivoroid). I also prefer wood rosettes over the abalone. I really don't like the abalone bindings and trims - it reminds me of tacky neon lights. I can appreciate the fancy woods though. Man, some of the LE's and BTO's that I've seen usually make me drool. And I have to admit that I do appreciate some of the cool inlays I've seen out there (I'll post one I found a while back that I thought would be cool to have). I'm not a fancy player, so a fancy looking guitar would not fit my simpler style. Bottom line, as everyone hear would say is tone. Whether fancy or simple TG guitars still have great tone.

jeffbelch

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 29
    • JeffBelcher.com
Re: The Appeal of Simple Guitars
« Reply #43 on: November 06, 2013, 12:20:46 PM »
My number one acoustic is a Gibson Songbird...no bling whatsoever, and I prefer it that way. :)
Jeff Belcher |
Rhoney Oceana | Fender '52 Reissue Tele | Gibson Songbird
Dr Z Z28 | Emery Sound Superbaby | Wolfetone Pickups | Barber LTD-SR Overdrive
Follower of Christ, husband to Kelly, father of five, and Worship Pastor at

izod

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: The Appeal of Simple Guitars
« Reply #44 on: November 16, 2013, 04:19:51 PM »
My 414ce-LTD (granadillo) has a very simple aesthetic (satin finish, no pickguard), and I think it looks much better than the standard 414ce.

And the 2013 FLTD 514e... wow! Love the headstock & wooden tuning pegs.
James

1981 Ibanez M340 (Sitka/Maple)
2013 Taylor 414ce-SLTD (Sitka/Granadillo)