Good points. The Martin is how ever the one everyone else has to live up to. They have been copied over and over thru the years. I still have a Taylor but the wife is about the only one who ever plays it. Only seen a couple in a bluegrass band. Seen a ton of Martins in bluegrass bands.
You seem to pop up here every month or so to do nothing more than to claim that Martins are better -- or more widely accepted -- than Taylors. Why is it so important to you for us -- in a Taylor forum -- to agree with you? Do you really think we're going to read one of your many Martin-is-better posts and say to ourselves, "Dang, I hadn't thought of that. I'm going to ditch all my Taylors and immediately buy Martins." Why does it not ever occur to you that we like our Taylors and nothing you have to say, which is extremely little, is going to change that?
I am lucky enough to be able to afford Martins and Taylors. In fact, I own a Martin because, for what it does, I prefer it over Taylor's offerings. But that's the exception. Overall I much prefer Taylors. Can you live with that? I've seen no evidence of it so far.
You've been called a troll in this forum because you have absolutely nothing to offer except to pour gasoline on the Taylor vs. Martin battle. How, exactly, does a thread about the significance of your first Taylor motivate you to start the Martin vs. Taylor war all over again? Why do you try so hard to change our minds? Why can't you just accept that beauty is in the eye of the beholder? Why, when you continually get the same reaction to your posts, do you come back here time after time and do the same thing over and over again? Why do you never learn?