Author Topic: Taylor 410  (Read 8460 times)

rosborn

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Taylor 410
« on: February 27, 2015, 08:01:14 PM »
Hello All,

I am interested in the Taylor 410 (without electronics).  I have read that the Ovangkol is similar to Rosewood.  I have a Martin D-18 (spruce over mahogany) and I am looking for something that sounds different.  Unfortunately, I don't have the opportunity to play it first as there are no 410s in my area, so I am buying from an online retailer.  I like the sound of Rosewood but I really can't afford a 800 Series guitar.

So...I would like to know your opinions of the 410 sound and how it compares to the 810.  Also, if any of you have a Martin D-18 how it compares with the 410.

Thank you and I look forward to your responses!

Rob

pw217

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Taylor 410
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2015, 08:30:31 PM »
We used to have a Martin D-18 (husband traded it for a Breedlove MC myrtle wood). And I've played my friend's ovangkol a bit. To me the ovangkol seems brighter than the rosewood 814 that I almost bought. Not as warm but similar tonal qualities. Re the Martin, it seemed a little more bass-y than my friend's Taylor guitar. Both were quite rich tonally though. Just slightly different. If you are trying to duplicate the D18, I'm not sure you will be 100% the same.

Edit: I just noted that you weren't trying to duplicate...sorry I misread. I think that you will find the ovangkol clearer, a bit brighter and (especially at the beginning) a bit crisper until it opens up a bit. It's rich but not as deep, IMO.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2015, 08:36:27 PM by pw217 »

rosborn

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Taylor 410
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2015, 08:36:30 PM »
We used to have a Martin D-18 (husband traded it for a Breedlove MC myrtle wood). And I've played my friend's ovangkol a bit. To me the ovangkol seems brighter than the rosewood 814 that I almost bought. Not as warm but similar tonal qualities. Re the Martin, it seemed a little more bass-y than my friend's Taylor guitar. Both were quite rich tonally though. Just slightly different. If you are trying to duplicate the D18, I'm not sure you will be 100% the same.

Hi!

Thank you for your reply!  I'm not trying to duplicate the sound of the D-18; rather, I'm trying to find an affordable Taylor that sounds very different from my D-18.  I don't want two guitars that sound alike - I couldn't justify that purchase.

Rob

pw217

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Taylor 410
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2015, 08:37:34 PM »
yes, I just caught that and edited my post about the same time that you responded. Sorry.

rosborn

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Taylor 410
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2015, 08:42:13 PM »
yes, I just caught that and edited my post about the same time that you responded. Sorry.

No worries.  Thank you very much for that feedback.

timfitz63

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3083
  • Getting better one strum at a time...
Re: Taylor 410
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2015, 09:00:12 PM »
Ovangkol has a similar tonal range as Rosewood, but the midrange is 'boosted' rather than 'scooped.'  So the 410 should definitely have a noticeable sonic distinction from your 810.

I personally prefer Ovangkol to East Indian Rosewood (like in your 810), but not as much as some of the brighter-sounding woods (e.g., Cocobolo, Koa, Maple).
DN: 360e, 510ce, 510e-FLTD, 810ce-LTD (Braz RW), PS10ce
GA: 414ce, 614ce-LTD, 714ce-FLTD, BR-V, BTO (Makore, 'Wild Grain' RW, Blkwood), GAce-FLTD, K24ce, PS14ce (Coco, Braz RW, "Milagro"), W14ce-LTD
GC: 812ce-LTD TF, BTO TF ('Sinker'/Walnut, Engelmann/"Milagro"), LTG #400
GO: 718e-FLTD, BTO (Taz Myrtle)
GS: Custom 516e, BTO 12's (Taz Tiger Myrtle, 'Crazy' RW), 556ce, 656ce, K66ce, PS56ce ("Milagro")
GS Mini 2012 Spring LTD (Blackwood)
T3/B: Custom (Cu & Au Sparkle)
T5: C1, C5-12, S (Aztec Gold)

rosborn

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Taylor 410
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2015, 09:35:36 PM »
Ovangkol has a similar tonal range as Rosewood, but the midrange is 'boosted' rather than 'scooped.'  So the 410 should definitely have a noticeable sonic distinction from your 810.

I personally prefer Ovangkol to East Indian Rosewood (like in your 810), but not as much as some of the brighter-sounding woods (e.g., Cocobolo, Koa, Maple).

Hi Tim,

I actually have  Martin D-18 (solid spruce top over solid mahogany back and sides) and not a 810.  I was using the 810 (Rosewood) as a reference to what I had read about the sound of the 410 (Ovangkol).  How about comparing the 410 to the D-18?  Any thoughts?

Thanks,

Rob

guitarsrsoawesome

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: Taylor 410
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2015, 10:01:29 PM »
Hey rosborn, my buddy has a D18v that I've played quite a bit and heard him play a lot as well...He also had an HD28 (rosewood).  I find as compared to the HD28, the D18 is brighter and cleaner tonally as a result of the mahogany.  Similarly, as far as an ovangkol Taylor goes, I also think it is brighter than the rosewood Taylors, but it still has a certain depth of tone and they say, as alluded to earlier, the mids are more pronounced than rosewood, that it has less of a "scooped eq".  I feel certain an ovangkol dread would sound at least somewhat different from your D18, but I'm wondering if you would want to consider a different shape such as the Grand Auditorium or Grand Symphony to further accentuate the difference?
November 2013 Taylor 514ce ES2
November 2011 Taylor GS Mini Mahogany

rosborn

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Taylor 410
« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2015, 10:23:41 PM »
Hey rosborn, my buddy has a D18v that I've played quite a bit and heard him play a lot as well...He also had an HD28 (rosewood).  I find as compared to the HD28, the D18 is brighter and cleaner tonally as a result of the mahogany.  Similarly, as far as an ovangkol Taylor goes, I also think it is brighter than the rosewood Taylors, but it still has a certain depth of tone and they say, as alluded to earlier, the mids are more pronounced than rosewood, that it has less of a "scooped eq".  I feel certain an ovangkol dread would sound at least somewhat different from your D18, but I'm wondering if you would want to consider a different shape such as the Grand Auditorium or Grand Symphony to further accentuate the difference?

That's and interesting suggestion.  What is the size difference between the 410 and the 414?  And, how  would the tone differ?

guitarsrsoawesome

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: Taylor 410
« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2015, 10:53:37 PM »
Hey rosborn, my buddy has a D18v that I've played quite a bit and heard him play a lot as well...He also had an HD28 (rosewood).  I find as compared to the HD28, the D18 is brighter and cleaner tonally as a result of the mahogany.  Similarly, as far as an ovangkol Taylor goes, I also think it is brighter than the rosewood Taylors, but it still has a certain depth of tone and they say, as alluded to earlier, the mids are more pronounced than rosewood, that it has less of a "scooped eq".  I feel certain an ovangkol dread would sound at least somewhat different from your D18, but I'm wondering if you would want to consider a different shape such as the Grand Auditorium or Grand Symphony to further accentuate the difference?

That's and interesting suggestion.  What is the size difference between the 410 and the 414?  And, how  would the tone differ?

The 414 is Taylor's Grand Auditorium which is Taylor's "flagship" shape in the sense that they probably sell more of this shape than any other and is a shape Bob Taylor came up with in the 90's (1994).  It has about the same girth at the lower bout as a dread but has more of an hour glass shape at the waist and a more narrow upper bout. It also is a bit less thick from back to top, so it's very comfortable. You can see more here:

http://www.taylorguitars.com/guitars/acoustic/shapes/grand-auditorium

I would say that this shape definitely still has good bass tone, but it also has quite a bit of sparkle (treble) that maybe a dread might lack.  Dreads, to me, bring more boom.  The GA might also respond better to finger picking (maybe a bit more responsive top) than a dread but can also be strummed aggressively as well, though a good dread can be hammered and you might not take it that far with a GA.  Nevertheless, the GA has plenty of headroom.  A poster on this forum, strumming fool, swears by this shape, and for good reason, it is VERY VERSATILE.

Anyway, I would definitely give it a consideration as it would be an even greater departure from the D18 than just a dread in ovangkol would.  You may not be able to find a ovangkol Taylor in your area, but if you have a store that sells Taylor, it is fairly certain they will have a GA shape in one of the guitars they offer, being Taylor's most popular shape, and you could at least try the shape to see what you think.  Even if they only had a 114 or 214 (laminate), they would still give you a good idea.  They sound great, too!

Let us know how it goes!

PS. Not to try to sell you on another Martin, but if Martins are the only guitars available at the stores in your area, most people would say they copied the Taylor GA shape with their Grand Performance series.  If you can see one of those in person, you will have gotten quite close to the Taylor GA shape and that can give you a good idea if the 414 would be a good shape for you.  BTW, the new 414ce (now that they're glossy finished) is on my radar, too!
« Last Edit: February 27, 2015, 10:58:09 PM by guitarsrsoawesome »
November 2013 Taylor 514ce ES2
November 2011 Taylor GS Mini Mahogany

timfitz63

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3083
  • Getting better one strum at a time...
Re: Taylor 410
« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2015, 11:08:48 PM »
Ovangkol has a similar tonal range as Rosewood, but the midrange is 'boosted' rather than 'scooped.'  So the 410 should definitely have a noticeable sonic distinction from your 810.

I personally prefer Ovangkol to East Indian Rosewood (like in your 810), but not as much as some of the brighter-sounding woods (e.g., Cocobolo, Koa, Maple).

Hi Tim,

I actually have  Martin D-18 (solid spruce top over solid mahogany back and sides) and not a 810.  I was using the 810 (Rosewood) as a reference to what I had read about the sound of the 410 (Ovangkol).  How about comparing the 410 to the D-18?  Any thoughts?

Thanks,

Rob

Sorry, Rob; I didn't read your post closely enough.

I personally have only played one Martin guitar; it was Spruce over Mahogany, but I'm not certain it was a D-18.  I was comparing it to the Taylor 510 (also Spruce over Mahogany), and for all intents and purposes, they were sonically equivalent to my ears.  So let's assume for the moment that your D-18 and my 510ce are similar enough in tone to qualify my 510ce as an analog for your D-18.

I've not directly compared a 410 to a 510; but I suspect that they would be largely similar in tonal profile.  Both Mahogany and Ovangkol project 'boosted' midrange frequencies, with Mahogany favoring a bit more of the high end and Ovangkol being a bit 'warmer' to my ears.  I think the primary difference would be in their overall tonal ranges; Ovangkol has a much wider response range (both toward high and low ends -- hence the reason it is often compared with Rosewood), whereas Mahogany tends to 'live' in the midrange frequencies.  I also don't generally find Ovangkol to have the clarity of Rosewood (or even Mahogany), which is one of the properties that I do like about that tonewood.

I think you could hear some differences in tone between a 410 and your D-18, but whether those differences would be different enough to satisfy you is a bit harder to pin down; it's a pretty subjective topic...  I suspect that a Rosewood guitar -- as opposed to Ovangkol -- would really be closer to what you're wanting...  But your budgetary considerations seem to be pushing you away from an 810...  Have you considered a used 810...?  Or, if you're a fan of bright-sounding guitars, a 'legacy' 610?  That would definitely be different from your D-18.

Regarding the Grand Auditorium (GA) compared to the Taylor Dreadnought (DN):  Both are similar in size, but the DN shape promotes the midrange frequencies, whereas the GA seems to provide a more even overall tonal balance.  So a 514 might strike you as quite different from your D-18, even though they both have solid Mahogany bodies.  If you can try out a 514, it wouldn't hurt to consider it.
DN: 360e, 510ce, 510e-FLTD, 810ce-LTD (Braz RW), PS10ce
GA: 414ce, 614ce-LTD, 714ce-FLTD, BR-V, BTO (Makore, 'Wild Grain' RW, Blkwood), GAce-FLTD, K24ce, PS14ce (Coco, Braz RW, "Milagro"), W14ce-LTD
GC: 812ce-LTD TF, BTO TF ('Sinker'/Walnut, Engelmann/"Milagro"), LTG #400
GO: 718e-FLTD, BTO (Taz Myrtle)
GS: Custom 516e, BTO 12's (Taz Tiger Myrtle, 'Crazy' RW), 556ce, 656ce, K66ce, PS56ce ("Milagro")
GS Mini 2012 Spring LTD (Blackwood)
T3/B: Custom (Cu & Au Sparkle)
T5: C1, C5-12, S (Aztec Gold)

Guitar Cowboy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
Re: Taylor 410
« Reply #11 on: February 28, 2015, 10:47:17 AM »
I don't know if this will help, but when I decided that I "needed" ( ha!) a K series guitar, I was also in a situation where there was no way to try one locally. So I had to resort to shopping on-line.  Wildwood Guitars (www. wildwoodguitars.com) has a good selection and they have sound and video clips of a lot of their guitars. You may be able to do a sound comparison of 400 series vs 800 series and they will also play and compare them for you. I was reluctant at first, but all worked out great when I purchased my K26.

Good luck
Steve
2020 326ce V-class soundhole cutaway prototype
(Mahogany/Urban Ash)
2019 E14 Limited Edition V-Class (Spruce/Ebony)
2019 814ce V-Class (Cedar/Rosewood)
2016 GS mini-E Koa
2015 618e 1st Edition (Torrified Spruce/Maple)
2014 K26ce (AA Koa- Wildwood CV) 
1980-something Yamaha  FG345II Dread

pw217

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Taylor 410
« Reply #12 on: February 28, 2015, 12:25:08 PM »
I don't know if this will help, but when I decided that I "needed" ( ha!) a K series guitar, I was also in a situation where there was no way to try one locally. So I had to resort to shopping on-line.  Wildwood Guitars (www. wildwoodguitars.com) has a good selection and they have sound and video clips of a lot of their guitars. You may be able to do a sound comparison of 400 series vs 800 series and they will also play and compare them for you. I was reluctant at first, but all worked out great when I purchased my K26.

Good luck

This is a really good suggestion. If you can listen to properly recorded videos at least it would give you an idea of sound comparisons. I know that some of the others have mentioned that the Mahogany isn't as deep as the Ovangkol. Since that was the opposite of what we noticed with our D-18 vs our friend's Taylor, (and we know that could have been anything from the particular trees used to the worn in sound of our guitar) so I would have had no idea it was the reverse in different circumstances. Sweetwater also has lots of videos for you to listen to different guitars. Even youtube does (if you can find one that has been properly recorded and not with bad sound equipment or odd effects added).

rosborn

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Taylor 410
« Reply #13 on: February 28, 2015, 01:44:16 PM »
I don't know if this will help, but when I decided that I "needed" ( ha!) a K series guitar, I was also in a situation where there was no way to try one locally. So I had to resort to shopping on-line.  Wildwood Guitars (www. wildwoodguitars.com) has a good selection and they have sound and video clips of a lot of their guitars. You may be able to do a sound comparison of 400 series vs 800 series and they will also play and compare them for you. I was reluctant at first, but all worked out great when I purchased my K26.

Good luck

Cowboy,

Unfortunately, the 400 series does not seem to be well represented on the Wildwood site.  In fact, there aren't a lot of videos available for the 400 series on the internet, period.

I'm not having much luck.

Thanks for the suggestion though.

Rob

lmacmil

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 361
Re: Taylor 410
« Reply #14 on: February 28, 2015, 02:28:58 PM »
There is a YouTube video comparing the 310 to the D18.  The Taylor is definitely brighter. One might assume the 410 would also be brighter and sound more different due to ovangkol instead of sapele back/sides.  Whether it's enough different to justify the purchase can only be determined by listening live.  Good luck.
Taylor GA3
Taylor 150e
Taylor 224ce-K