I use medium-lights on my 2010. I want heavier bottoms, not heavier tops. My tops are loud enough.
Which is
exactly why I have since gone to the medium-light PBs on GA and GC bodies for yeeeaars now. The heavier EAD suits these smaller-ish Taylor bodies superbly, balancing the bass notes perfectly with the trebles, IMHO.
...It makes me wonder about the claim that these HD strings somehow enhance the low end?!
It just seems backwards but maybe Andy knows something we don't?....
I agree wholeheartedly: to me, the former point is
total marketing spin. Yeah, how
lighter-gauge bass strings can somehow enhance low end is a serious push ...lol! I can only speculate on the latter point: Andy Powers has revoiced the new lineup ...seemingly having tipped the overall timbre toward more bass. Or at the very least, this greater bass response is true of my 2013 616Spr.Ltd. (euro spruce/macassar). Or maybe it's just the coinciding of the GS body's girth, the Adi-CV bracing, and the macassar b/s,
all along with Powers' revoicing that this guitar is markedly bass heavy. Don't get me wrong, I love that it contrasts its brethren, but for
this player it was screaming for a bit of timbral rebalancing
Suffice it to say for my ears, the HDs are simply a way to tame the bass-heavy tone of a guitar, whatever its size. But lets face it, barring that occasional guit, pre-Powers guitars are hardly bass-
heavy cannons. That's just not the "Taylor voice" ; and that tonal balance
is one of the very reasons I own Taylors and not others.
As with all things "tone," beauty is in the ear of the beholder, and such a tonal experiment is a cheap one, all things considered. But if one merely thinks about the simple difference between the HD and regular set (ignoring the ad copy), then the intuitive voice in one's head likely will answer whether the HD really has anything to offer the player. IMHO, anyway.
Edward