Author Topic: mini - not so mini. An actual size comparison with small Martins  (Read 7450 times)

fretted

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
So here is a comparison of sizes between the GS mini and Martin 0 and 00's

Martin Size 0 (14 fret):        Body Depth at deepest -  4 1/4"    Body Width at widest - 13 1/2"     Body Length - 18 3/8"
Martin Size 00 (14 fret):      Body Depth at deepest -  4 1/8"    Body Width at widest - 14 5/16"   Body Length - 18 7/8"
Taylor GS mini:                    Body Depth at deepest -  4 7/16"  Body Width at widest - 14 3/8"     Body Length - 17 5/8"
 
Of course the scale length of the Martins is longer at 24.9", while the mini is 23.5", but I have a 00-18 Martin and it is nowhere near as loud as my mini mahogany, so it doesn't seem to suffer for that 1.4".
The late John Pearse, iconic acoustic guitar player and Martin aficionado believed the Martin size 0 to be the optimum size for the folk guitar as quoted on page 240 in the book,  GUITARS by Tom and Mary Evans.

Source of Martin data: MARTIN GUITARS - A History by Mike Longworth
Source of Taylor data:  Taylor Website
1993(?) 410 Special Edition (Rosewood/cut-away)
1995 412
1997 810
1998 Mahogany Baby
2000 714
2010 DN3
2013 Mini Mahogany
2014 522 12 fret
About two dozen other brands of guitars, mandolins, ukuleles, banjos and Venezuelan Cuatros, not to mention the flutes, pennywhistles and the piano.

ctkarslake

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 432
Re: mini - not so mini. An actual size comparison with small Martins
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2013, 10:40:12 AM »
Nice to  hear the Mini doesn't suffer volume loss compared to the Martins.  Thing is, aren't the two Martins "adult" sized guitars?  So wouldn't it make more sense to compare the Martin 0+00 to the Taylor GC, since they are the same "short" scale guitars?  Maybe I'm missing the point of your thread?  If so, sorry, I'll go back to work now...
1989 712
1992 410
1992 412
1995 410
1995 422
1996 412-M
1996 450
1997 412
1997 420-R
2007 GC3

fretted

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: mini - not so mini. An actual size comparison with small Martins
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2013, 12:49:01 PM »
I think the point of my thread is that the mini may qualify as an "adult sized" guitar because it's as big, or even bigger than Martin 0's and 00's - in the body anyway. It's all in the perception . . . and in the adjectives. But then again isn't everything.
1993(?) 410 Special Edition (Rosewood/cut-away)
1995 412
1997 810
1998 Mahogany Baby
2000 714
2010 DN3
2013 Mini Mahogany
2014 522 12 fret
About two dozen other brands of guitars, mandolins, ukuleles, banjos and Venezuelan Cuatros, not to mention the flutes, pennywhistles and the piano.

jpmist

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 211
    • Soundcloud
Re: mini - not so mini. An actual size comparison with small Martins
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2013, 04:07:23 PM »
My sister got one over the weekend and I've been trying to get her thru the buyer's remorse period. I'm trying hard to get her to keep it cause she's got child sized hands and gripes constantly about not being able to reach notes on her 412.

I was surprised at the volume and the tone seemed pleasant, although slightly boxy. But I'd love to see her stick with it as the narrower neck and shorter scale suits her so much better.

Size wise, the body is not that much smaller than my Larrivee OO, so I'd consider it an adult size couch guitar.
Taylor 322CE, Larrivee OO-05, Larrivee OOV-03, Strats
https://soundcloud.com/jpmist/got-cover

TaylorGirl

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5761
  • 7 Mountain Dulcimers!
Re: mini - not so mini. An actual size comparison with small Martins
« Reply #4 on: April 02, 2013, 04:15:57 PM »
My husband bought me my GSM primarily for travel, but I use it for jamming on occasion and it holds its own.  Sure, it can't compare to my 414, but I'm pleasantly surprised with how much it does fit the bill as an "adult" guitar when it has to.
Susie
Taylors: 914 ○ K24ce ○ 414 ○ GSMeK+
Pono Guileles: Mango Baritone Deluxe ○ Mahogany Baritone

Have been finger-pickin' guitar since 1973!

oatordeal

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 343
  • Manila, Philippines
Re: mini - not so mini. An actual size comparison with small Martins
« Reply #5 on: April 02, 2013, 09:52:11 PM »
last weekend i was hanging out with my bandmate and his friend brought a gs mini (hog). it's not as loud as my 814ce, but it can really sing! i love the shape and the feel of the neck. i just wish it came with the same nut width.
Best regards,
Nims

814ce 2012
GS Mini Hog 2015
'52ri Fender Telecaster 2007

Nomad

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 369
Re: mini - not so mini. An actual size comparison with small Martins
« Reply #6 on: April 03, 2013, 02:39:04 PM »
It's not called a "Mini" because it's small when compared to Martins, it's called a "Mini" because it's small when compared to a full-size GS.

fretted

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: mini - not so mini. An actual size comparison with small Martins
« Reply #7 on: April 03, 2013, 02:53:44 PM »
I have an 714 cedar top from 2002 I think and an 810 from the late 90's . . . and various Martins, a Gibson etc. I love all those guitars but I can't put down my new mini mahogany. Maybe it's just because it's new. I've never had so much fun playing. Too much in fact. I just start playing everything I know well because it's fun and sounds delicious instead of getting down to practice the rough spots. I'll get over it, I always do.
 
1993(?) 410 Special Edition (Rosewood/cut-away)
1995 412
1997 810
1998 Mahogany Baby
2000 714
2010 DN3
2013 Mini Mahogany
2014 522 12 fret
About two dozen other brands of guitars, mandolins, ukuleles, banjos and Venezuelan Cuatros, not to mention the flutes, pennywhistles and the piano.